#1
·
2026-05-05
·main@HEAD
follow-builders
zarazhangrui/follow-builders
🛠60 / 100
⚛
→
⚗
→
🧬
🛑
0–29
⚠️
30–49
🛠
50–79
🏭
80–100
▼
60
🛠· 60 / 100
- ✓5 claims passed, no critical failures
- ⚠README may claim a license but no LICENSE file exists
- ◐release_pipeline=1, recently_active=True
- ✓multilingual_readme=true
- ⚪static-only eval; live e2e pending
#2
#3
#4
Install via OpenClaw or Claude Code skill loader | any | easy |
git clone + agent setup conversation | any | easy |
Zara's central feed pipeline
Pre-fetched + summarized content (the core value)
No API key needed — but it's a single point of failure with no SLA. If her server stops, your digest stops.
Anthropic Claude / OpenClaw
Agent host
Standard agent-side cost
Telegram / Discord / WhatsApp / email
Optional digest delivery channel
Pick one delivery method; in-chat is the no-setup default
· 7
5 1 1
| +40 | |
| +13 | |
| +7 | |
| +3 | |
| 0 | |
| -3 |
6 / 7
passed claim-001
passed claim-002
passed claim-003
passed claim-004
passed claim-005
failed claim-006
untested claim-007
input_contract | |
|---|---|
output_contract | |
determinism | |
idempotence | |
no_skill_callouts | |
failure_mode_clarity |
workflow_correctness | |
|---|---|
declared_call_graph | |
stop_conditions | |
handoff_points | |
atom_evidence | |
error_propagation | |
partial_failure_handling |
- core user-facing layer untested → capped at 'usable'
- hybrid-repo rule: archetype 'hybrid-skill' requires end-to-end evaluation of the user-facing layer
- evidence_completeness='partial' (not portable) → capped at 'usable'
- only 3/4 critical claims covered
archetype: hybrid-skill→core_layer_tested? False→evidence: partial→recommended: usable→final: usable
ceiling 1 · core user-facing layer untested → capped at 'usable'
ceiling 2 · hybrid-repo rule: archetype 'hybrid-skill' requires end-to-end evaluation of the user-facing layer
ceiling 3 · evidence_completeness='partial' (not portable) → capped at 'usable'
| claim-001 | SKILL.md 完整且 ≥ 200 行(不只是占位) | critical | skill-shape | ● passed | |
| claim-002 | 5 个 prompt 文件真实存在且与 README 一致 | critical | prompt-coverage | ● passed | |
| claim-003 | 三种 feed JSON 文件真实存在且对应 README 数字 | critical | feed-coverage | ● passed | |
| claim-004 | scripts/ 真有 generate-feed + prepare-digest + deliver 三个 Node 脚本 | high | pipeline | ● passed | |
| claim-005 | 双语支持真实(README + 翻译 prompt) | high | i18n | ● passed | |
| claim-006 | 仓库有 LICENSE | high | licensing | ✕ failed | |
| claim-007 | 端到端 happy path:用户能在 1 次对话内完成订阅 | critical | end-to-end | ○ untested |
0%
0.00s
0
run-static-checks
2026-05-05
0% — tokens in ? / out ?
run-static-checks
2026-05-05
0% — tokens in ? / out ?
# follow-builders — final verdict (2026-05-05) ## Repo - **Name:** zarazhangrui/follow-builders - **Branch:** main@HEAD · **Stars:** 3,689 - **Archetype:** hybrid-skill · **Layer:** molecule ## What was evaluated | Claim | Status | Notes | |---|---|---| | 001 SKILL.md ≥ 200 lines | passed | 466-line SKILL.md with frontmatter | | 002 5 prompt files | passed | All present, 1.0–2.6 KB each | | 003 source list = README | passed | config/default-sources.json: 25 X + 6 podcasts + 2 blogs | | 004 Node.js pipeline | passed | generate-feed (38 KB) + prepare-digest (5 KB) + deliver (7 KB) | | 005 bilingual | passed | README.zh-CN.md + prompts/translate.md | | 006 LICENSE | **failed** | HTTP 404 | | 007 live e2e | untested | needs Claude Code session + delivery channel | ## Real findings 1. **No LICENSE** — same gap as `codebase-to-course`. Author-level pattern. Easy upstream fix. 2. **The "no API keys needed" architecture is clever.** The user-facing skill is light because Zara runs a central Node.js pipeline that pre-fetches and summarizes everything. Trade-off: every user is tightly coupled to her server uptime — single point of failure with no documented SLA or fallback. 3. **466-line SKILL.md is unusually thorough.** Most skills are 100-200 lines. The depth here suggests serious investment in making the conversational setup work without config files. 4. **38 KB `generate-feed.js`** — this is real engineering, not a demo. The maintainer has invested in the central pipeline. ## Why not higher - LICENSE missing (-5 score, claim-006 failed). - Live e2e not logged (molecule layer cap; central pipeline single point of failure means a live test is more important than usual). ## Path forward 1. Add LICENSE to repo root. 2. Run a real setup + delivery scenario, ideally with Telegram bot token, log first-digest delivery. 3. Test "central server unreachable" scenario; verify error surfaces to the user (not silent skip). 4. Update claim-006 + claim-007.